Tuesday, September 8, 2026

POLITICS IN NIGERIA





Conscience vs Emotion In Nigeria's Political Discourse.

‎Let me start by saying something many Nigerians may not want to hear: It is not every person shouting “conscience!” that is asking you to think. Some are just asking you to obey their emotions.

‎In Nigeria today, manage to disagree with a popular political opinion and you may immediately hear: “You have sold your conscience.” “You have collected money.” “You are defending corruption.” “You are a traitor.” black black bla!

‎But the uncomfortable question is: when did conscience become the same thing as agreeing with the crowd?

It may interest you to know that ‎from where I stand and with  what I know, conscience is supposed to make you think. It should make you question your own side before attacking the other side. It should demand evidence. It should expose hypocrisy. It should restrain hatred. It should insist on accountability even when the person being held accountable is your candidate, your party, your ethnic brother, your religious ally or your political hero. That is what true conscience does 

On the other hand, ‎emotion is different because it says: “I like this person, therefore everything they say must be true.”  ‎Emotion says: “I hate this person, therefore nothing they do can be good.” ‎Emotion shares the viral video before checking the facts. ‎Emotion believes the headline without reading the report. ‎Emotion insults the person who disagrees instead of answering the argument. ‎And once politics or any other relevant field of endeavour becomes emotional enough, people can be manipulated into defending things they would normally condemn. That is where it becomes dangerous because a citizen who cannot control his emotions can easily become a tool in someone else’s political strategy.

‎Therefore, I'd urge us to be honest with ourselves. To digest that, let's be be reminded that there are three categories of people we deal with in every space, be it social, cultural, political, economical or religious. The first are  people who believe everything they hear without any form of inquisition.The second are  people who doubt everything but never verify anything. And the third  are people who take responsibility for finding the truth no matter what they are told and who said it. They research. They compare records.They examine evidence. They ask difficult questions. They are willing to criticize their own side. And they are willing to change their position when the evidence changes.

If you ask me, I will tell you that ‎Nigeria needs more of the third category because democracy is not simply about having millions of voters. Democracy is about having informed voters. And this is where our political discourse has become dangerously shallow. We spend hours arguing about personalities while ignoring performance. We defend politicians because they speak our language. We support candidates because they belong to our ethnic group. We excuse incompetence because the politician is from our region. We forgive corruption because “our own” is involved. Then we turn around and  complain that Nigeria is not working.

‎And I ask: How will Nigeria work when our standards change depending on who is holding power? In my view, leadership should be evaluated by evidence, not noise, not popularity, not propaganda and definitely not social-media trends.

‎Ask instead: what was promised? What was delivered? How much was budgeted? How much was spent? What systems were created? What institutions became stronger? What jobs were created? What infrastructure was delivered? What changed in the lives of ordinary citizens?And perhaps the most important question is: what happens after the politician leaves office? The reason is because real leadership should leave behind systems, not just billboards, slogans and photographs.

‎Look at Lagos for instance. You may quickly ask: is Lagos perfect? Absolutely not. Does Lagos still have serious problems? Of course yes!. But one important lesson from Lagos that you cannot ignore is the value of policy continuity. Since the return of democracy in 1999, successive administrations have built on different aspects of a broader development direction and laid out plan. That continuity has contributed to the evolution of institutions, infrastructure and economic activity across the state, including the BRT system, LASTMA, Lagos Rail Mass Transit projects, major road and transport investments, revenue reforms and the development of the Lekki corridor. You'll find out that major private-sector investments, including the Dangote Refinery, have also emerged within an ecosystem shaped by infrastructure, policy, investment and economic activity.

‎But again, let's be intellectually honest: No politician personally built Lagos, instead Governments, civil servants, businesses, investors and citizens all contributed and still contributing. ‎And that is precisely the point: Development is bigger than one politician. I say this because a serious leader should be able to continue a good project started by a predecessor instead of destroying it simply because someone else initiated it. That is how nations develop, not through perpetual political reinvention. But through institutions, through continuity, through accountability, and through long-term thinking. This is also why I reject the idea that Nigerians should be emotionally blackmailed into believing that every opposition politician is a saint and every person in government is a devil.

‎Please hear me clearly: there are no saints in politics!. You will agree that many people currently presenting themselves as the solution have previously held public office as governors, ministers, legislators or local government leaders. ‎This is fine, but  show us the record.


Where you previously governed, what did you build? What institutions did you strengthen? What measurable outcomes did you produce? What did you get wrong? What continuity plan did you leave behind? What would you do differently today? ‎This is the conversation Nigerians should be having: Not endless name-calling. Not ethnic warfare. Not religious manipulation. Not social-media hysteria. And certainly not political cultism.

‎‎To this end, let me say this quickly, you can support a government without worshipping it. You can oppose a government without hating the country. You can acknowledge an achievement without joining the ruling party. And you can criticize a failure without becoming an opposition propagandist. ‎This is political maturity. And yes!, reforms can be painful but we must not forget that Nigeria has accumulated decades of structural problems evident in weak institutions, infrastructure deficits, unemployment, insecurity, energy challenges, corruption, policy inconsistency and low productivity. Anyone promising to solve all of that overnight deserves serious scrutiny.

‎Let me also say this, government cannot on the other hand use “reform” as a magic word to justify every failure. What this means is that every reform must ultimately answer to evidence: what problem is it solving? What is the cost? Who bears the burden? What is the timeline? What are the measurable outcomes? And what corrections are being made when implementation fails? That is how serious citizens should think.

‎Not: “My party said it, so I believe it.”

‎Not: “My influencer said it, so it must be true.”

‎Not: “Everybody is saying it, so it must be correct.”

‎On this i must remind us that popularity has never been proof of truth, because a lie can trend, a falsehood can receive one million views, a politician can fill a stadium and still lack competence, a person can quote Scripture every day and still behave hypocritically, and someone can disagree with you and still be right.

‎Let that last line sink in for a second:"Someone can disagree with you and still be right."

‎This single principle would improve Nigeria's political conversation tremendously if we considered it relevant I promise. So before you accuse another Nigerian of “selling their conscience,” ask yourself: have I checked the facts? Have I examined the opposing argument? Have I studied the record? Would I apply the same standard if my preferred politician were involved? Am I defending principle or merely defending my team?

‎‎This interrogations are sacrosanct because if your standard changes depending on who benefits, that is not conscience, but  loyalty disguised as morality. 

Now, I want you to ‎get this clearly: At this point in our history, Nigeria does not need citizens who support everything. Neither does Nigeria need citizens who oppose everything. But We do need citizens capable of critical support. Citizens who ‎support what works. Citizens who challenge what fails. Citizens who demand accountability. Citizens who reject misinformation. Citizens who reject hatred. Citizens who reject political manipulation. And Citizens who think beyond the next election. This is necessary because, first, your vote  should not be seen as a weapon for revenge, instead your vote should be seen as an investment in the future of our dear great nation Nigeria.... What this means is that through your vote, ‎you are choosing people who will influence public resources, institutions, policies, security, infrastructure, education, healthcare, employment and the economic environment in which millions of Nigerians will live. ‎So choose with your head as well as your heart and be reminded that Nigeria cannot afford another generation of emotionally captured citizens. Rather, we need citizens who can think. Citizens who can verify. Citizens who can disagree without hatred. Citizens who can criticize without destroying. Citizens who can support without worshipping. Citizens who understand that leadership is about service, capacity, institutions and results.

‎If you have read to this point and believe that  political participation is a responsibility, and not a spectator sport, then don't stop at Facebook arguments: Get involved. Study the issues. Question your leaders. Engage your community. Register. Participate. And Organize.

‎And if you believe the APC is the platform through which you can contribute to the leadership, governance and development conversation, consider joining and becoming an active participant. On this I urge you to Kindly register with our great party.

‎But  most importantly, whether you support APC or another political platform, let us agree on one thing: Nigeria must come before political emotion. ‎Therefore, let conscience lead, but again, let conscience be informed by facts. Let leadership be judged by results. Let development be measured by what survives the politician. And let our politics be driven by wisdom, sacrifice, stability and humanity, not hatred, hysteria and manipulation.

Like this, ‎the question is no longer simply, “Who are you supporting?” ‎The real question is: “Why are you supporting them, and can you prove that your reason is in Nigeria’s long-term interest?” ‎That is the conversation we need. That is the standard we must demand. And that is how we begin building a Nigeria worth handing over to the next generation.

‎God bless the Federal Republic of Nigeria.🇳🇬

‎God bless the Nigerian people 🙏

‎God bless President Bola Ahmed Tinubu #GCFR.

‎Shalom!

‎[ACN_JN8:12]

#newground2026 #leadership #nigeria #everyone #NationBuilding #impact 

Sunday, September 6, 2026

WEEKEND DIGEST




 SUNDAY DIGEST!

‎A Little  Search In The Archives, And A Bigger Question About Leadership.

‎Sometimes, the past deserves to be revisited, not to reopen old wounds, but to remind ourselves of the kind of leadership we should demand from anyone asking for our trust.


‎In May 2022, Nigeria witnessed the horrific killing of Deborah Samuel Yakubu, a 200-level student of Shehu Shagari College of Education in Sokoto, after allegations that she had made a blasphemous statement.

‎Whatever one's religion, ethnicity, political affiliation or personal feelings, one principle should have been non-negotiable: ‎A human being must not be lynched by a mob.The law must decide guilt. Not a crowd. Not anger. Not religious sentiment. Not political calculation.

‎Against that background, something happened that deserves to remain in our national political memory.

‎On May 12, 2022, a tweet from Alhaji Atiku Abubakar's verified account condemned Deborah's killing and called for those responsible to be brought to justice:  “There can not be a justification for such gruesome murder. Deborah Yakubu was murdered, and all those behind her death must be brought to justice. My condolences to her family and friends.”

‎The tweet generated significant engagement (526 retweets, 100 quote tweets and 1,625 likes), and, according to contemporary reports, attracted both support and strong criticism before it was deleted.

‎It was followed by “This Tweet has been deleted.” after some backlash from his Muslim supporters 

‎The clearest contemporary report is from Channels Television, on May 13, 2022. Atiku said the tweet condemning Deborah Samuel’s killing had not received his approval, and that he ordered it removed: ‎“Every tweet has to get my approval. Unfortunately, this tweet – because I was travelling all over the country – did not have my approval. So, I said it should be taken down and that every tweet must have my express approval.” 

‎According to the contemporaneous report, Atiku wrote on his Facebook page: ‎ “This evening, I received information that a post was made that doesn’t agree with my orders. I use this to announce that any post without AA is not from me. May God protect – AA.” 

‎This was specifically in response to the post condemning the killing of Deborah Samuel, which had been deleted after the backlash.

‎There is a second, later explanation from Atiku that is even more explicit. When asked why he deleted the tweet, he said: “I asked the tweet to be deleted because I normally approve every tweet and since I did not approve the tweet, I asked them to delete it.” 

‎He said: “Every tweet has to get my approval.”

‎He explained that because he was travelling, the particular tweet had been posted without his approval and that he instructed his team to take it down.

‎He subsequently maintained that he was not afraid to take a stand on controversial issues and pointed to his previous position on Sharia as an example.

‎Months later, when the matter resurfaced, he gave essentially the same explanation: he asked for the tweet to be deleted because he had not personally approved it. He also stated that he had condemned Deborah's killing in subsequent statements.

‎These are the documented parts of the story.

‎But there is a bigger question for Nigerians. And this question is bigger than Alhaji Atiku Abubakar: What should leadership look like when doing the right thing becomes politically inconvenient? Because this is where politics becomes more than elections. We must know that a leader is not tested when everybody agrees with him. Rather a leader is tested when speaking the truth may cost him applause, votes, relationships, influence or political advantage. A leader is tested when his own supporters are angry. A leader is tested when his own community disagrees with him. A leader is tested when condemning injustice may create political discomfort. And sometimes, leadership requires the courage to say: “This is wrong, and I will not defend it because it is wrong.”

‎That is the kind of leadership Nigeria desperately needs. We should also be careful not to turn Deborah's death into another weapon for religious or ethnic division. That would defeat the very lesson her tragic death should teach us.

‎Following the killing, the Sultanate Council, Catholic Bishop Matthew Kukah, Late President Muhammadu Buhari, the Northern Governors Forum and others condemned the killing and called for the rule of law. Buhari explicitly stated that no person had the right to take the law into their own hands. The Nigerian Bar Association also called for the prompt prosecution of those responsible, arguing that accountability was necessary to strengthen citizens' confidence in the rule of law.

‎That is the standard we should be demanding.

‎Not: “Is he my Muslim leader?”

‎Not: “Is she my Christian leader?”

‎Not: “Is he from my North?”

‎Not: “Is she from my South?”

‎Not: “Will his victory benefit my ethnic group?”

‎But: “When my life, rights and dignity are threatened, will this person stand for justice even when justice is inconvenient?”

‎That is the question we should ask because because Nigeria does not merely need politicians who know how to win elections. We need leaders who know how to carry responsibility. We need leaders who understand that governance is not a reward for political loyalty. We need leaders who can distinguish between religious sensitivity and mob justice, political strategy and moral cowardice, popularity and integrity, compromise and betrayal of principle. And above all, we need leaders who understand that human life cannot become a bargaining chip in the struggle for political power.

‎There is another lesson here for us as citizens. We should stop choosing leaders simply because they can mobilise your anger. A politician who constantly tells you who to hate may be useful during an election, but that does not automatically make him capable of governing a complex country like ours.

‎At this moment: Nigeria needs someone who can sit with people who disagree with him. Someone who can protect the minority when the majority is angry. Someone who can defend the unpopular citizen. Someone who can make difficult decisions without first conducting a poll to determine which decision will generate the most applause. Someone who understands that stability requires sacrifice. Someone who understands that development requires discipline. Someone who understands that empowerment requires institutions, not just handouts. Someone who understands that governance is ultimately about people.

‎The Deborah Samuel tragedy should therefore not be remembered merely as another political talking point. It should force us to ask ourselves: What kind of leader are we preparing to entrust with Nigeria? A leader who protects truth only when it is politically safe? Or a leader who protects truth because it is right? A leader who calculates the electoral consequences before condemning injustice? Or a leader who understands that some principles should never be negotiated? A leader who governs through division? Or one who can bring Nigerians together without asking them to surrender their identity, faith or dignity?

‎This is not about asking anyone to hate Atiku Abubakar. It is about asking Nigerians to examine the record of every politician including those we support with the same intellectual honesty.

‎If we cannot question our preferred candidates, we are not citizens exercising democratic judgment, instead We are supporters defending a football club. ‎And Nigeria is too important to be reduced to football. 

‎Therefore, the next election should not only be about who can defeat whom. It should be about who can unite us. Who can protect life. Who can respect the rule of law. Who can make unpopular but necessary decisions. Who can sacrifice political convenience for national stability. Who can build institutions stronger than individuals. Who can empower citizens rather than permanently keep them dependent. And who can look at a Nigerian in distress, not first as a voter, Muslim, Christian, Northerner, Southerner, Hausa, Igbo, Yoruba or minority but simply as a human being whose life and dignity matter.

‎That is the leadership standard we should be building toward, because Nigeria does not need leaders who are merely popular, rather Nigeria needs leaders who are principled. ‎And most importantly, Nigerians must stop rewarding political convenience when what the country desperately needs is courage, competence, compassion and character.

‎Henceforth, before you defend a politician, study the record. Before you vote for a politician, study the character. Before you campaign for a politician, ask what happens when power conflicts with principle. And before you give anyone your mandate, ask the most important question: “When doing the right thing becomes politically expensive, will this person still do it?” ‎Because ultimately, leadership is not the art of pleasing everybody. Leadership is the courage to do what protects the people even when it costs you something.

‎I therefore call on Nigerians to raise the standard. Let us interrogate records, not rumours. Let us challenge our own camps, not only opposing camps. Let us reject religious and ethnic manipulation. Let us reward competence over propaganda, character over cultism, unity over division, and humanity over political convenience.

‎This has become necessary because Nigeria's future will not be determined only by the politicians we elect. It will also be determined by the standards we, as citizens, are willing to accept from those who seek our mandate.

‎Pease study the record, ask difficult questions, discuss respectfully, and when the time comes, vote for the Nigeria you want to build not merely the politician you want to win.

‎Shalom!

‎[ACN_JN8:12]

‎#newground2026 #leadership #nigeria #everyone #NationBuilding #impact

POLITICS IN NIGERIA

Conscience vs Emotion In Nigeria 's Political Discourse. ‎Let me start by saying something many Nigerians may not want to hear: It is no...